If the Earth is not a sphere, and it is not precisely an ellipsoid, what the heck is
it? Allow me to break the rules and answer this question with another. What reference
would you use to base a determination of the shape of the earth on? We could use the
surface of the land mass. However, this would get very complicated considering the
mountainous nature of almost all land masses.
Sea level. Thats it! Well determine the shape of the earth by measuring the
shape defined by the surface of the oceans which cover two thirds of the Earths
surface. Good idea; but not very practical. The level of the oceans changes dramatically
as the gravitational pull of the sun and the moon produce the phenomena known as tides.
Weather patterns, ocean currents, and a whole host of other factors also contribute to a
rather complicated picture. Thus, while we often talk about sea level, this concept is
rather vague when we propose to accomplish some accurate measurements of the earth.
The answer geodesists have come up with is the concept of gravitational potential. That
is, imagine a surface defined by all points where the force of gravity is the same, and
which also approximates sea level. Visualize this surface as a three dimensional contour
of all points at which the force of gravity is the same somewhat "arbitrary
value". Then, adjust the "arbitrary value" so that the resulting surface
approximates your best determination of the average level of the oceans. This surface,
imaginary and somewhat subjective as it is, then is accepted as the surface which defines
the shape of the earth.
Is this surface equivalent to an ellipsoid? Well, almost. It turns out that the
material of which the Earth consists is not completely uniform throughout. Regions of
denser material exists here and there intermingled with regions of material which is less
dense. The gravitational force, which is dependent on mass, varies unpredictably from one
place to another. The resulting shape, therefore, is a rather complex undulating shape
with many peaks and valleys distributed over the entire surface of the Earth. However,
geodesists have been able to establish an ellipsoid such that the height of the highest
peaks and the depths of the deepest valleys are on the order of 100 meters from this best
fitting ellipsoid.
So while the mathematically specific ellipsoid is a pretty good representation of the
true shape of the earth, it is only a very good approximation. There is no mathematically
defined surface which truly represents the shape of the earth; the earth is a unique shape
all of its own. Geoid, a term derived from the Greek word geoeides meaning
earthlike, is used to refer to the rather odd shape of the imaginary, somewhat subjective,
surface which is taken to be the shape of the earth.
As we learned above, the geoid is not a mathematical shape. That is, there are no
mathematical formulas which describe it, or which can be used to perform geometric
calculations on its surface. To be sure, several approximations have been determined, but
these are all in the form of complicated mathematical series with hundreds, if not
thousands, of coefficients. The complexity of these formulas even tests the power of the
newest computers. So whats a Casual Cartographer to do?
What cartographers have been doing for several centuries now. Believe me, dealing with
the mathematical formulas which describe the ellipsoid is not trivial. In fact, the
ellipse and its cousin the ellipsoid, present several problems for which there are no
analytical solutions; only very good approximations. But these complications are orders of
magnitude less severe than that of the geoid. So, cartographers, surveyors, and in many
cases geodesists, use the mathematical formulas for the ellipsoid; specifically, the
ellipsoid which best fits the region which is being mapped or measured. With modern
satellites and sophisticated electronic measuring equipment, the ellipsoid defined for use
in the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84) is the ellipsoid which represents the best
fitting ellipsoid for the entire world; although Im sure there are some who would
disagree. This is the ellipsoid upon which all calculations built into the Global
Positioning System (GPS) are based. This ellipsoid also represents a common standard which
can be used around the world.
Of course, the Casual Cartographer will encounter maps and map data which has been
developed based on other ellipsoids. This is a major part of the issue of datums discussed
in previous issues of the casual cartographer. These ellipsoids, in theory anyway,
represented the ellipsoid which best fit the geoid in the particular region being mapped
or measured. Legacy maps and map data of Russia are usually based on the Kravosky
ellipsoid; maps in south Asia are usually based on the Everest ellipsoid. In Europe, the
Hayford (a.k.a The International) ellipsoid was quite popular. Thus, it is important that
your GIS system provide the ability to perform cartographic calculations using any of
these ellipsoids.
We learned that the term geoid is used to refer to the true shape of the earth,
generally defined as the equi-potential gravity surface which "best" fits the
surface of the oceans; whatever that shape really is. This shape closely resembles the
shape of an oblate ellipsoid. And, because the mathematical model of the ellipsoid is so
much simpler than that of the geoid, that most all cartography and surveying is based on
the approximation that the Earth is an ellipsoid. Finally, we notice that in either case,
geoid or ellipsoid, the shape of the earth is very close to, although not exactly, a
sphere. Thus, the earth is indeed a spheroid. A special case of a spheroid, to be sure,
but a spheroid nonetheless. Therefore, all three terms can, technically, be used to
describe the shape of the earth. However, the term geoid infers a higher degree of
precision than does ellipsoid, and ellipsoid infers a higher degree of accuracy than
spheroid. Depending upon the nature of the specific topics being discussed, the terms are
often used interchangeably.